Sugar Waxing Vs. Shaving

Sugar Waxing Vs. Shaving

Sugar waxing and shaving are two of the oldest hair removal techniques. But shaving is by far more popular because it’s cheaper and easier.

But sugar waxing is more effective and hygienic.

In this article, we will compare both removal techniques and everything you need to make a choice.


What is Shaving?

Shaving involves using a razor to trim hair down to skin level. So shaving doesn’t remove hairs in the real sense of the word. 

It cuts it down to an acceptable level. 

History suggests that cave dwellers used flintstones to shave their hairs. You can imagine the difficulty they faced. 

Today we have good shaving razors and clippers that shave faster. But these tools brought more issues to worry about.

Shaving down your hair to skin level darkens your skin and causes bumps because of regrowth.


What Is Sugaring?

Sugaring is also an ancient hair removal technique using “sugar wax or paste.”

Typically, to produce a sugar wax, you need sugar, lemon juice, and water. It’s natural and cruelty-free.

Sugar paste and waxing are used interchangeably, but they’re quite different.

Yes, they use the same ingredients, but wax is a ticker than paste.

Sugar waxing is stickier than paste, and it’s more effective for removing thick hair.

But both are effective and removes hair from the roots, giving fewer chances for regrowth.


Which Is Better Between Shaving And Sugar Waxing

Shaving and sugar waxing have both pros and cons, which makes them stand out uniquely.

To help you make an informed decision, we will compare them using the following factors:

#1. Pain

Removing hair from the root is always more painful than trimming. So, shaving is less painful than sugar waxing.

The only time you may encounter pain is if the blade cuts your skin.

Sugaring is mildly painful,  and you can bear it for the 2-3 seconds you feel it after uprooting the hairs.

#2. Cost

Shaving is more affordable than sugaring because you can reuse your razor as many times as you want.

But if you consider the benefits, sugaring is worth the cost.

#3. Frequency Of Regrowth

Sugaring reduces the speed of regrowth and thins out hair over time. And it’s because the hair is plucked out completely from the root. So it takes longer to grow back.

With sugaring, you can stay up to 6 weeks without worrying about hairs.

It’s not the same with shaving because it only takes out hair from the surface. So the hair grows much faster, from a few hours to a day.

#5. Bumps & Irritation

Cuts are not the only downside of shaving. Bumps, ingrown hairs, and other forms of irritation are very common with shaving.

But with sugaring, you won’t have to worry about any of these effects.

You can have that smooth and flawless skin without dealing with bumps or ingrown hair. 

And even if they do occur, they are usually very minimal.

#6. Effect On The Skin

Sugaring exfoliates the skin and removes unwanted hair and dead skin cells to give you very smooth, soft, and glowing skin.

Shaving almost always irritates the skin; it causes itching and several other skin irritations. 

Also, sugar, which is a major component of the sugaring paste, is antibacterial. So bacteria can't grow on the paste or get transferred into your open pores.

#6. Hair Condition

Shaving causes hair to grow out thicker and denser after cutting.

But sugaring causes weakens the hair follicle to grow weaker and sometimes collapses it. So your hair can be smooth for a lifetime.


Shaving or Sugaring: Which Is Better

Shaving has its pros and cons, but it stands no chance against sugaring.

We can categorically say that sugaring is better than shaving.


Because it offers you the best of two worlds, it strikes a perfect balance between everything good in both shaving and waxing.



Now, having gone through the list of what is obtainable with both. It seems only fair to tell you to ditch shaving and go for what works--which in this case will be sugaring.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.